Load low-bandwidth site?
Help

Characteristics, context and risk: NGO insecurity in conflict zones

Published:
1 January 2007
Region:
Global
Topics:

Share this:

Characteristics, context and risk: NGO insecurity in conflict zones

This paper reports on research conducted on the insecurity of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) between 1999 and 2002, with the goal of contributing to the debate on the reasons why NGO actors are targets of violence in conflict settings. The research involved the collection of data from three countries—Angola, Ecuador and Sierra Leone—and exploration of the relationship between levels of insecurity, context and the characteristics of NGOs. Four risk factors appear to heighten the degree of insecurity that NGOs face: (1) carrying out multiple types of activities and providing material aid; (2) ‘operationality’ (that is, implementing programmes and activities); (3) working with both sides of the conflict; and (4) integrating into the local community. The paper discusses the methodological approach adopted for the research, the differences between ambient and situational insecurity and the findings related to risk factors. It concludes with a summary of the study’s implications.

Related:

Institute of Risk Management – Charities Special Interest Groups Spring 2015 Newsletter

The Spring 2015 Newsletter from the Institute of Risk Management - Charities Special Interest Groups.

Humanitarian action in the new environment: policy and operational implications in Somalia and Somaliland

This study aims to measure the insecurity of aid workers in Somalia and Somaliland, identifying changes in perceptions of security and threat levels, mapping the individual security practices of key humanitarian actors and their collective security arrangements, and drawing conclusions as to how the security environment has impacted upon humanitarian…

Gender Diversity Dynamics in Humanitarian Negotiations: The International Committee of the Red Cross as a Case Study on the Frontlines of Armed Conflicts

Negotiations for access are crucial for the success of humanitarian operations. They also occur in contexts of armed conflict and violence that typically entrench gender identities. Building on the vast research showing that gender affects the conduct and outcome of negotiations, this paper explores gender dynamics in a humanitarian setting.