Load low-bandwidth site?
Help

Bold Steps, Quiet Impact: Pathways to Influencing and engaging Executive Leadership in Security Risk Management

Image for Bold Steps, Quiet Impact: Pathways to Influencing and engaging Executive Leadership in Security Risk Management
Published:
15 September 2025
Region:
Global
Topics:

Share this:

Bold Steps, Quiet Impact: Pathways to Influencing and engaging Executive Leadership in Security Risk Management

Effective engagement of executive leadership is essential for establishing and sustaining security risk management (SRM) as a strategic priority in aid organisations.

However, as outlined in the GISF & Humanitarian Outcomes 2024 report, State of Practice: The Evolution of SRM Practice in the Humanitarian Space, practitioners face systemic barriers, ranging from cultural resistance to competing priorities and limited resources. These challenges are compounded by the dynamic risk environments in which humanitarian aid organisations operate, demanding innovative and context-specific approaches to leadership, collaboration, and SRM practice.

This report draws upon quantitative data from a survey of GISF members and qualitative insights from the “Engaging Executive Leadership” focus groups conducted during GISF workshops in Washington, D.C. (10 September 2024) and Edinburgh (11 September 2024).

By examining the factors influencing leadership engagement, the study underscores the critical role of leveraging data, enhancing competencies, and strategically utilising crises as catalysts for strengthening leadership support.

Related:

State of Practice: The Evolution of Security Risk Management in the Humanitarian Space

As a subject of humanitarian policy and practice, security risk management (SRM) has been an active and growing – yet largely understudied – area of operations. Only a small number of comprehensive, sector-wide analyses of SRM have been published over the past two decades, and none of them are recent…

Neutrality, Access, and Making Localisation Work

Neutrality is one of the four humanitarian principles. It states that humanitarian action must not favour any side in an armed conflict or other dispute. Despite being a central component of humanitarianism, the concept of neutrality is fraught with complexity. This research paper explores the complications surrounding neutrality. It focuses…