Load low-bandwidth site?
Help

Humanitarian Outcomes | No easy choice: A humanitarian’s guide to ethical, principled decision making

Image for Humanitarian Outcomes | No easy choice: A humanitarian’s guide to ethical, principled decision making
Published:
13 May 2024
Topics:

Share this:

Humanitarian Outcomes | No easy choice: A humanitarian’s guide to ethical, principled decision making

Humanitarians often face difficult ethical dilemmas: from immediate operational choices to bigger strategic questions. A dilemma is defined by the need to choose between two or more difficult options that could have negative consequences. A dilemma means that there is no obvious or ideal choice. Humanitarian principles (humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence) alone do not always help us make the best decision. Principles themselves may ‘create’ the dilemma. When we face only bad options, or the principles are in conflict, ethical deliberation can help us decide on the best way to carry out principled humanitarian action.

This guide offers a tool and a process for structured deliberation to help organisations and individuals make better choices for principled humanitarian action. It is based on an applied ethics approach,which addresses real-world challenges using ethical theories and principles.

Related:

State of Practice: The Evolution of Security Risk Management in the Humanitarian Space

As a subject of humanitarian policy and practice, security risk management (SRM) has been an active and growing – yet largely understudied – area of operations. Only a small number of comprehensive, sector-wide analyses of SRM have been published over the past two decades, and none of them are recent…