Load low-bandwidth site?
Help

Digital Security of LGBTQI Aid Workers: Awareness and Response

Image for Digital Security of LGBTQI Aid Workers: Awareness and Response
Published:
15 December 2017
Region:
Global
Topics:

Share this:

Digital Security of LGBTQI Aid Workers: Awareness and Response

As the world becomes increasingly connected and more of our lives are recorded, accessed and processed digitally, the nature of threats and personal risks changes. Digital security threats on their own can have a range of consequences to a person’s life – from identity theft and fraud to destroying a credit history or ruining a reputation. 

For lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) aid workers working in areas of the world that are hostile and sometimes violent to people who identify or are perceived as LGBTQI, these digital threats can translate into real incidents in the physical space, such as harassment and imprisonment. 

In this article, Mala Kumar (2017) discusses these digital threats and ways in which aid workers and non-governmental organisations can prepare and respond to them. 

For up-to-date maps on sexual orientation laws (as seen in the article) please consult the ILGA Maps on Sexual Orientation Laws. 

Related:

Managing the Security of Aid Workers with Diverse Profiles

An aid worker’s personal security is impacted by the interplay between where the aid worker is, who they are, and their role and organisation. As employers, aid organisations have a duty of care to take all reasonable measures to protect their staff from foreseeable risks, including those that emerge due…

Building an Inclusive Security Risk Management Culture: Musings of the GISF Director

On World Humanitarian Day 2018, GISF's Executive Director, Lisa Reilly, considers how NGOs can build a more inclusive security risk management culture.

2018

Beyond the Tick-box: developing a person-centred approach to security risk management

Security Risk Management (SRM) is first and foremost about the protection of individuals, but it is sometimes at risk of losing this focus and becoming over-procedural. In too many instances, SRM is perceived as an administrative burden, limiting - rather than enabling - staff actions.  To be truly effective, SRM should be thought, communicated and implemented in a way that is person-centred. This blog presents what makes a person-centred approach to SRM, deconstructing its rationale, challenges and looking at ways to move forward with it.

2019